ONE BRICK COURT | 1BC

Chambers of Andrew Caldecott QC. clerks@onebrickcourt.com | Tel: 020 7353 8845 | Fax: 020 7583 9144 | @OneBrickCourt
News/Articles Search


Advanced search
Cases Search

Advanced search
Barristers
Richard Rampton QC

Richard Rampton QC
Call: 1965 Silk: 1987

Find out more


Specialists in media and information law

One Brick Court is a leading set of barristers’ chambers practising in all aspects of media and information law, including defamation, privacy, confidence, contempt of court, reporting restrictions, freedom of information and data protection.

Winner of Set of the Year for ‘Defamation and Privacy’ in the Chambers and Partners Bar Awards 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Latest News & Cases RSSRSS

Permission to appeal granted in Gulati & Ors v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)

11th August 2015 - The Court of Appeal has granted Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd permission to appeal against the judgment of Mr Justice Mann in Gulati & Ors v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch). In that decision, eight claimants were awarded a total of £1.2m in damages for privacy infringements arising primarily from phone hacking. The hearing of the appeal is to be expedited.

Judgment has today been handed down by Warby J in the case of Lachaux v AOL (UK) Ltd.

30th July 2015 - The claimant was successful in showing that the first Huffington Post article complained of had caused serious harm to his reputation, but unsuccessful in relation to the second article. AOL (UK) Ltd, the publisher of the Huffington Post, is to seek Warby J’s permission to appeal his decision relating to the first article at a hearing next term. Manuel Barca QC and Hannah Ready, instructed by Lewis Silkin LLP, represent AOL.

Google Inc. v Vidal-Hall & ors

23rd July 2015 - Supreme Court grants Google permission to appeal in relation to data protection issues arising from Safari browser cookie case. Catrin Evans acts as junior counsel for Google (instructed by Bristows LLP)

Coventry & ors (Respondents) v Lawrence & Anor (Appellants) [2015] UKSC 50

22 July 2015 - By a majority of 5-2, the Supreme Court has held that the regime for the recovery of costs in civil litigation in England and Wales under the Access to Justice Act 1999 (“AJA”) is compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.